Posted by: sean | October 28, 2008

Obama Hussein Marx

I was watching CNN International this evening after work when they introduced a clip that made me think I’d be seeing a big Biden gaffe, but when they actually showed the clip, I pretty much agreed with Biden’s response to what was clearly a ridiculous question. I’ve seen some pretty stupid interviews, but this has got to be up there:

Q: You may recognize this famous quote, “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.” That’s from Karl Marx. How is Senator Obama not being a Marxist if he intends to spread the wealth around?

A: Are you joking? Is this a joke?

Q: No.

A: Is that a real question?

Q: That’s a question.

A: (laughter)

Here’s the whole thing:

Hertzberg also has a nice little piece on, like, Socialism, in The New Yorker, which talks about McCain’s agreement back in 2000 on paying more taxes if you’re richer, Palin’s collective wealth sharing in Alaska, and the difference between Marxism and McCain’s tax plan, according to the GOP:

The Republican argument of the moment seems to be that the difference between capitalism and socialism corresponds to the difference between a top marginal income-tax rate of 35 per cent and a top marginal income-tax rate of 39.6 per cent. The latter is what it would be under Obama’s proposal, what it was under President Clinton, and, for that matter, what it will be after 2010 if President Bush’s tax cuts expire on schedule. Obama would use some of the added revenue to give a break to pretty much everybody who nets less than a quarter of a million dollars a year. The total tax burden on the private economy would be somewhat lighter than it is now—a bit of elementary Keynesianism that renders doubly untrue the Republican claim that Obama “will raise your taxes.”


  1. Wow. Thanks for posting the clip.

    I remember asking my American roommate when I first arrived in NYC why not more people stood up against this (in my eyes) insane amassing and displaying of wealth that I saw all around. He said:

    ‘I’d rather suffer to death, with the possibility to come out on top of everyone else, than share (which will leave me no doubt comfortable but with the knowledge that I will never be incredibly rich).’

    That one sentence made me understand that ‘a socialist country like Sweden’ is meant to be derogatory, and the idea of ‘spreading wealth’ not a good plan for a presidential hopeful.

  2. It’s amazing to me. Although almost everyone agrees that having tens of millions of uninsured children is a bad thing, in the same breath, many of these same people will tell you that universal healthcare is a bad thing, because “it’s communism.”

    And then you have idiots like the woman asking the question who obviously have no idea what words like Marxism actually mean.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: