Posted by: sean | November 13, 2011

The prisoner swap and Idi Amin

The NYT Magazine has a piece today on the prisoner swap between Hamas and Israel. The article itself is an example of the Israeli-centric view of the conflict that focuses on Gilad Shalit without bothering to think at all about dehumanized Palestinian prisoners, many of whom are children. The focus, as usual, is on Israeli casualties without expressing, for example, how many Palestinian civilians were killed in Israel’s 2008-09 “Operation Cast Lead” (between 726 and 926 — full list of casualties here) or in the case of the 2006 war, how many people were killed at all in Lebanon (around 1,191). In other words, the question of how many Arab civilians Israel deems it acceptable to kill in order to free its  military captives isn’t even posed.

That said, the piece does include some very interesting information that I was unaware of. For example, the Israeli decision to assassinate Ugandan president and tyrant Idi Amin at Entebbe if they had the chance:

Rabin signed off on the Entebbe plan only after intelligence agents assured him that aerial surveillance showed Ugandan soldiers guarding the terminal where the hostages were being held, indicating that the building was not booby-trapped. (These same documents also reveal the orders to follow if the commandos ran into Idi Amin himself. “He isn’t a factor,” Rabin said. “If he interferes, the orders are to kill him.” To which the foreign minister, Yigal Allon, added, “Also if he doesn’t interfere.”)

Another tidbit that I was unaware of regards the prisoner swap with Ahmed Jibril of the PFLP-GC:

The first to grasp how sensitive Israeli public opinion was on the issue of hostages and M.I.A.’s — and therefore what a powerful weapon abduction could be — was Ahmed Jibril, the leader of a faction of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. In 1979, Israel reluctantly agreed to its first disproportionate exchange with a guerrilla organization when Jibril insisted on getting 76 P.L.O. members in exchange for one hostage.

Jibril’s greatest success came in the mid-1980s, when in exchange for three Israeli soldiers he demanded the release of 1,150 prisoners. The group included some of the most infamous terrorists held by Israel, including Kozo Okamoto, a Japanese Red Army member who participated in the massacre of 26 people at the arrivals hall in Lod Airport in 1972. In the wake of Jibril’s demand, Israel attempted to put counter-pressure on him by kidnapping his sister’s son, Murad al-Bushnak, whom Israeli agents lured to Beirut with promises of a weekend of sex, drugs and gambling. Instead, Bushnak was captured and taken to an underground interrogation cell, where he quickly gave up the phone number of Jibril’s home in Damascus. A senior intelligence officer dialed the number and made Jibril a simple offer: a quick swap, without anyone knowing, of Bushnak for the three Israelis. Jibril calmly upped his price to include his nephew.

Interestingly enough, the NYT piece doesn’t distinguish between the capturing of soldiers or militants and the kidnapping of civilians. This is routine in the Western press when Israel and Palestine are concerned: the kidnapping of Jibril’s civilian nephew (or other examples of similar behavior) are often not reported at all or are described as a normal security tactic, while the capturing of Shalit, a soldier, is painted as morally outrageous.



  1. Thank God you’re back, I forgot how horrible those Jews are (I assume it’s okay to drop the veil of “Israelis” now that you’ve seemingly given the okay to references of extreme Jews using the Holocaust to cover up their crimes). You miss several points. Cast Lead was not a war fought for Schalit, but a response to years of rocket fire on civilians. Lebanon is even less related, so I don’t see how these casualty figures (which have certainly been widely reported in the West) have anything to do with this article… except to show us who controls the media ;). Did someone say selective? And your civilian casualty number contradicts not only the IDFs, but Hamas as well, who both claim the vast majority to have been combatants. By the way hundreds also died in NATO airstrikes in Libya but, again, it just ain’t a crime if the Jews didn’t do it. Furthermore, you cannot compare Bushnak’s abduction with Schalit’s because it was very short, and there would have been no other way to have him questioned (as opposed to when you ask for help from another civilized country). This sort of “rendition” is certainly not unique to Israel, and while undesirable, probably saved many innocent lives. Schalit, on the other hand, was held for five years, while not having been in a combat scenario, and wasn’t even given the most basic rights of the Geneva Conventions like a visit from the Red Cross… and he came out after little exposure to sunlight, clear malnourishment, and degraded eyesight. Yes this is more outrageous.
    Finally, Schalit is more “humanized” because he comes from a society that cares about him so deeply as a human and sacrificed so much to get him back. Meanwhile the prisoners released were some of the most violent killers of women and children, who Palestinian society celebrated and honored upon their return. Of course you could talk about this cult of death and terrorism in the territories, where killing women and children is enough to make you a hero, you could talk about more people dying in Syria (which you still haven’t condemned several months in), but those Jews… if you won’t write about how evil they are, who will?

  2. BTW the Times’ post-exchange editorial put the entire blame for the lack of movement in the peace process on Israel. Is that Israel-centric too? Because that’s them giving their view explicitly, rather than leaving out facts that have nothing to do with the story, which you use as some kind of proof…

  3. You’re right, the West should stand up for Arab dignity (since the Arabs won’t) and demand that in all future swaps, one Israeli captive is equal to one Arab captive (or convicted terrorist–I mean resistance member). How dare the Israelis so dehumanize the Palestinians by letting go of all those people they asked for! How can the West put up with this? If Ahmed Jibril doesn’t care about the fate of his family, then it is incumbent upon us to take on that burden.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: